River Moyar Conservation

Hydroelectric Projects and their impact on the Landscape and River Moyar

Critical to the characterization process is the impact of Hydro-electric power projects in the Nilgiris, which have a distinct bearing not only on the river course and the river basin through dams and associated power houses, but also due to river course manipulation and the subsequent linkages that have been forged.

Pykara is one of the highest of south Indian streams originating in the Mukurti peak at an altitude of around 2400m ASL. It is the biggest stream in the Nilgiris Plateau. The stream flows over a number of cascades and waterfalls that it provides a drop of about 1000m before it reaches the Pykara Dam at Glenmorgan. Downstream, Pykara joins the River Moyar and eventually River Cauvery through its tributary, the River Bhavani.

The Pykara Hydroelectric Project Scheme was the first hydroelectric project that the state of Tamil Nadu (erstwhile Madras) launched and successfully implemented. The Project that was formally sanctioned during the British rule in 1929 was meant to generate and supply electricity for the industries in Coimbatore. Situated in the Nilgiris Plateau, the Pykara HP stands out as the highest in Asia and continue to be amongst the highest of hydroelectric projects in the world (source: Pell Frischmann Group and TNEB).

The Pykara Ultimate Stage Hydroelectric Project (PUSHEP) that was completed during the beginning of the 21st century was formally inaugurated in September 2005. The power generation capacity of PUSHEP is 150 MW.

Temporal and Spatial spread

The Pykara HP has been implemented in stages over a period of 75 years; PUSHEP being the final one. The spadework for the Project started in 1932. The first power-generating units were small with a capacity of 6.5 MW. Three such units were installed in the powerhouse located at Glenmorgan taking advantage of the run-of-river water alone. In order to enhance the available flow, two regulating storages were added.

These storages were located at Mukurti (upstream) and Pykara (downstream). The additional flow thus achieved enabled the installation of more power generation units. Subsequently, another storage dam was built across the Sandynallah stream. This reservoir was built to regulate and divert flows from a catchment of 44.03km² into the Pykara Dam. The network of reservoirs thus built helped achieve the set target of generating 70 MW of electricity.

In 1955, the Nilgiris Plateau experienced yet another major transformation due to the Kundah Hydroelectric Scheme. The Kundah HS led to the creation of Avalanche Dam (372m long; 57.66m high) and Emerald Dam (328.6m long; 65.72m high) around Portimund within the Kundah basin. A 733.77m long horseshoe-shaped tunnel that had the capacity to discharge 900 cusecs of water connected the two dams. The Avalanche and Emerald streams were tributaries that directly fed Pykara before the dams were constructed.Two other dams were constructed across the tributaries of Pykara in 1965; Parson’s Valley Dam (14.5km²) and Portimund Dam (10.6km²). These dams enhanced the volume of water that got diverted into the Kundah basin.

The Naduvattam Diversion Project completed in 1976 harnessed water from the 12.82km² Naduvattam basin that lies to the west of Pykara basin. In order to augment further the power generation capacity of the Pykara HP, water was diverted from the 12.95km² Lone Valley and Melkodmund stream in the Nilgiris Plateau; both streams flowed between Pykara and Sandynallah. The huge volume of water thus diverted into the Pykara Dam necessitated the enlargement of the fore bay. The enlargement of the Pykara fore bay was completed in 1978-79.

During the 1990s when the Pykara HP was in its final stage of implementation (PUSHEP) it had a well-established network of reservoirs that harnessed water from a catchment fed by Pykara, Sandynallah, Naduvattam, Melkodmund and Lone Valley streams (tributaries of River Moyar). The catchment has provided the gross storage necessary for making PUSHEP operational and generating the additional 150MW of electricity that was envisaged).

During 1946-52, the Moyar Hydroelectric Scheme was implemented. The Scheme was implemented using the tail water of the Pykara HP. The project is located at a distance of 16km downhill of the Pykara (Glenmorgan) power station. The Moyar HS also benefits by the water that is diverted from the Maravakandy Dam (located north-east of Masinagudi) through a flume channel. At Maravakandy there is a mini-hydroelectric scheme capable of producing 2.6 MW of power (Tyagi, 1995). The Maravakandy-Moyar flume channel is 6.81km long and 10.86m wide. The Moyar Ultimate Stage Hydroelectric Project (MUSHEP) that was proposed in 1995-1996 had envisaged the widening of the flume channel by another 2m. The channel that is around 2m deep had 19 bridges across it; 3 wide (5-11m), 16 narrow (1-5m) and 3 underground passages. The various hydroelectric projects that were implemented since 1932 in the Nilgiris Plateau together established a 53km network of tunnels (INO, 2007).

Building a Grassroots Constituency to Conserve the River Moyar in the Mysore-Nilgiri Corridor

Social Assessment to ensure compliance to CEPF Policy on Indigenous People

We proposed the project titled ‘Building a Grassroots Constituency to Conserve the River Moyar in the Mysore-Nilgiri Corridor on the premise that conservation programmes in the region have until date largely been perfunctory. We also found it ideal to propose a programme that takes a landscape approach rather be constrained by a politically or administratively defined unit, to ensure that the coverage is vast and uniform. The third and the most important factor that motivated us to propose this project is the fact that conservation research or programmes in the proposed project area have hitherto been very scarce in studying or involving human communities. It needs to be mentioned though that there have been a number of anthropological inquiries on the indigenous communities of the Nilgiris, largely during the Colonial period.

The proposed project design which takes the course of River Moyar as the deciding factor, covers at least five panchayats (decentralized grass root level planning and administrative units). This coverage though is not uniform. While the three panchayats viz Masinagudi, Mudumalai and Sholur would be most critical, the other two cover the fringe areas.

In-depth demographic studies of the three panchayats have not been carried out in the past; our preliminary assessment suggests that the landscape is home to the following broad categories of humans viz.

  1. Early settlers – largely during Pre-Colonial period who are now under the scheduled caste category of backward and most backward residing as homogenous units
  2. Recent settlers – mostly migrants in search of livelihoods
  3. Recent settlers – tribal communities – mostly communities in search of livelihood opportunities, landless labour and communities displaced from adjacent districts.
  4. Scheduled Tribes / Indigenous tribal communities – the original residents of the landscape, a number of endogamous groups. Notable for their involvement in the protection of the landscape. View themselves as custodians of the forest. Strong presence of customary rights and regulation in the use of natural resources. Notable are the Kurumbas (and their four sub-groups) and Irulars. Scheduled Tribes.
  5. The Scheduled Caste communities – considered the lowest in caste hierarchy. Not recognized by any past intervention in the landscape.

In view of the above, and also the past experience of working in other landscapes we propose the following:

The key outcome of the proposed project is the micro-plan, taking into consideration the following aspects:

  • the project will not propose or create new jobs or provide dole in any form
  • the project will recognize traditional and local institutions where indigenous and tribal communities are represented
  • the project will ensure that no community is excluded because of their caste or tribal identity
  • the project will ensure that marginal groups within the communities such as women are represented strongly.
  • the project will attempt to understand and incorporate local cultural beliefs and norms for micro planning and will not seek to alter the same.

The project will be implemented only after consultations are held at the field level. These will be facilitated by the Gram sabha (an entity that is strictly voluntary and representative of all the communities) and the elected panchayat.

The proceedings of these consultations will be developed into mutual agreements.

The project will be jointly implemented with the Gram sabha and the panchayat. And as detailed in the proposal, it will be subjected to local review.

The Gram Sabha and the elected Panchayat for each community where the project will be implemented will function as a grievance mechanism for Indigenous People or other local communities who have any concerns or grievances about the project to raise them with the project team. In the unlikely event that a grievance is raised, Arulagam will ask the relevant Gram Sabha or Panchayat to convene a meeting between the project team and the affected parties, in order to resolve the conflict.

Arulagam will seek to hold these meetings within one month of any grievance being communicated to them. Any grievance raised will be communicated to CEPF, together with minutes from the meeting held to address them, plus a detailed plan of remedial action.

Long term sustainability of the project will be ensured will the project team working closely with the Gram Sabha and the Panchayat to develop proposals for the consideration of the State and Central Government, Other Non governmental organizations and Donor Agencies.

As a collaborative group of institutions striving to reconcile conservation and development goals, we appreciated the safeguards policy of CEPF and shall strive to adhere to all the issues/concerns and terms listed in the policy document.

Annotated List of Fishes Identified from the Bhavani-Moyar and Bhavani Sagar Riparian Ecosystem

S.No.

Name of the Species

Source of Information

Mukherji Srinivasan & Ganesan Rajan Menon Yazdani et al CEPF Project
1 Amblypharyngodon melettinus     +      
2 Anguilla bengalensis*   + +     +
3 Aorichthys aor   +        
4 Aorichthys seenghala   +       +
5 Barbodes bovanicus       + +  
6 Barbodes carnaticus + + + + + +
7 Barbodes jerdoni     +   + +
8 Barbodes sarana   + +   + +
9 Barilius bendelisis     +   + +
10 Barilius gatensis +   + + + +
11 Catla catla   +       +
12 Channa gachua   + + + +  
13 Channa marulius*   +       +
14 Channa punctatus   +     +  
15 Channa striatus   +        

Annotated List of Fishes Identified from the Bhavani-Moyar and Bhavani Sagar Riparian

Mukherji D D (1937) On a small collection of fish from the Bhavani river (S. India) BNHS35: 162-171 R Srinivasan and R Ganesan (1955) Contributions from the freshwater biological research station Bhavanisagar, Madras State No 1 Rajan, S (1955). Notes on a collection of fish from the headwaters of Bhavani river, south India. JBNHS 53: 44-48& Rajan, S (1963) Ecology of the fishes of rivers Pykara and Moyar (Nilgiris), S. India. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 58 (B): 291-323 Menon, A G K (1999) Checklist –Freshwater Fishes of India, ZSI/Occasional Paper No 175 Yazdani, G M, Rema Devi, K, Raghunathan, M B and Singh, F D (2001) Fauna of Conservation Areas, Series 11: Fauna of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. Zoological Survey of India, pp207-224; this list is based on published information and 25 surveys in and around the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve; only those specifically mentioned as Bhavani and/or Moyar Rivers are included. CEPF- Team: R J Ranjit Daniels, C Chenna Krishnan, N Muthu Karthick, K Ramasamy (Tracker), L Selvam (Fisherman), Kumar (Driver-cum-fisherman), Mahesh (Forest Guard), Das (Forest Watcher); Fish reported/seen during the field trip to Bhavani Sagar and Moyar River in February (8-11) 2011 and April (10-11) 2011

Indirect Sightings of Animals Recorded in River Transect Walk

S.No.

Name of the Species

Indirect Evidence

Encounter Rate/km

% Encounter Rate

1 Tiger (Panthera tigris) 7 0.2 2.4
2 Leopard (Panthera pardus) 5 0.1 1.7
3 Sloth Bear (Melursus ursinus) 10 0.2 3.4
4 Wild Dog or Dhole (Cuon alpinus) 4 0.1 1.4
5 Striped Hyena (Hyena hyena) 2 0.0 0.7
6 Chital (Axis axis) 70 1.5 23.8
7 Sambar (Rusa unicolor) 26 0.6 8.8
8 Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) 2 0.0 0.7
9 Black-naped Hare (Lepus nigricollis) 3 0.1 1.0
10 Asiatic Elephant (Elephas maximus) 101 2.2 34.4
11 Gaur (Bos gaurus) 5 0.1 1.7
12 Feral Buffalo (Bubalus sp.) 12 0.3 4.1
13 Wild Pig (Sus scrofa) 6 0.1 2.0
14 Indian Porcupine (Hystrix indica) 17 0.4 5.8
15 Bonnet Macaque (Macaca radiata) 3 0.1 1.0
16 Oriental Small-clawed Otter (Aonyx cinerea) 6 0.1 2.0
17 Bengal Monitor Lizard (Varanus bengalensis) 1 0 0.3
18 Marsh Crocodile (Crocodylus palustris) 14 0.3 4.8

Direct Sightings of Animals Recorded in River Transect Walk

S.No.

Name of the Species

# sightings

# individuals

Mean group size

Encounter Rate/km

1 Chital (Axis axis) 9 110 12.2 2.39
2 Sambar (Rusa unicolor) 3 6 2 0.13
3 Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) 3 6 2 0.13
4 Asiatic elephant (Elephas maximus) 3 11 3.7 0.24
5 Gaur (Bos gaurus) 3 8 2.7 0.17
6 Feral Buffalo (Bubalus sp.) 4 37 9.25 0.81
7 Wildpig (Sus scrofa) 2 3 1.5 0.07
8 Bonnet Macaque (Macaca radiata) 12 86 7.17 1.87
9 Tufted Gray langur (Semnopithecus priam) 13 159 12.23 3.46
10 Indian Giant Squirrel (Ratufa indica) 6 7 1.17 0.15
11 Oriental small-clawed otter (Aonyx cinerea) 1 2 2 0.04
12 Bengal Monitor Lizard (Varanus bengalensis) 3 3 1 0.07
13 Marsh Crocodile (Crocodylus palustris) 10 14 1.4 0.30
14 Indian Rock Python (Python molurus molurus) 1 1 1 0.02

List of Riparian Plants Found Along River Moyar

S.No.

Family

Species

Habit

Nativity

1 Combretaceae Terminalia cuneata Roxb Tree Native
2 Fabaceae Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre Tree Native
3 Myrtaceae Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels Tree Native
4 Ebenaceae Diospyros malabarica (Desr.) Kostel. Tree Native
5 Euphorbiaceae Homonoia riparia Lour. Shrub Native
6 Sapotaceae Madhuca neriifolia (Moon) H.J. Lam. Tree Native
7 Euphorbiaceae Trewia nudiflora L. Tree Native
8 Anacardiaceae Mangifera indica L. Tree Native
9 Melastomataceae Memecylon umbellatum Burm. Tree Native
10 Poaceae Bambusa bambos Voss Tree Native
11 Rubiaceae Ixora pavetta Andr. Tree Native
12 Lythraceae Lagerstroemia microcarpa Wight Tree Native
13 Meliaceae Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Tree Burma
14 Caesalpiniaceae Bauhinia racemosa Lam. Tree Native
15 Sapindaceae Schleichera oleosa (Lour.) Oken Tree Native
16 Rubiaceae Canthium coromandelicum (Burm. F.) Alston Shrub Native
17 Meliaceae Aglaia elaeagnoidea (Juss.) Benth. Tree Native
18 Celastraceae Pleurostylia opposita (Wall.) Alston Tree Native
19 Celastraceae Cassine glauca (Rottb.) Kuntze Tree Native
20 Bignoniaceae Stereospermum colais (Buch.-Ham. ex Dillw.) Mabb. Tree Native
21 Rhamnaceae Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. Tree Native
22 Salicaceae Salix tetrasperma Roxb. Tree Native
23 Loganiaceae Strychnos nux-vomica L. Tree Native
24 Rubiaceae Pavetta indica L. ex K. Schum. Shrub Native
25 Verbenaceae Vitex leucoxylon L.f. Tree Native
26 Fabaceae Dalbergia latifolia Roxb. Tree Native
27 Solanaceae Datura sanguinea Ruiz & Pavon Shrub Tropical America
28 Rubiaceae Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. Tree Native
29 Euphorbiaceae Phyllanthus polyphyllus Willd. Tree Native
30 Verbenaceae Vitex altissima L.f. Tree Native
31 Euphorbiaceae Drypetes roxburghii (Wall.) Hurusawa Tree Native
32 Caprifoliaceae Viburnum punctatum Buch. - Ham. ex D. Don Liane Native
33 Tiliaceae Grewia tiliifolia Vahl. Tree Native
34 Mimosaceae Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) Dc. Tree Tropical America
35 Myrtaceae Psidium guajava L. Tree Native
36 Rhamnaceae Ziziphus oenoplia (L.) Mill. Liane Native
37 Combretaceae Terminalia elliptica Willd. Tree Native
38 Boraginaceae Cordia monoica Roxb. Tree Native
39 Rutaceae Glycosmis mauritiana (Lam.) Tanaka Shrub Native
40 Caesalpiniaceae Tamarindus indica L. Tree Tropical Africa
41 Ulmaceae Celtis timorensis Spanoghe Tree Native
42 Melastomataceae Memecylon grande Retz. Tree Native
43 Rutaceae Atalantia monophylla (L.) Correa Tree Native
44 Euphorbiaceae Jatropha curcas L. Shrub Tropical America
45 Caesalpiniaceae Cassia fistula L. Tree Native
46 Rubiaceae Psydrax dicoccos Gaertn. Tree Native
47 Oleaceae Olea dioica Roxb. Tree Native
48 Rutaceae Pleiospermium alatum Swingle Tree Native
49 Euphorbiaceae Bischofia javanica Blume Tree Native
50 Moraceae Ficus microcarpa L.f. Tree Native
51 Sapotaceae Mimusops elengi L. Tree Native
52 Meliaceae Cipadessa baccifera (Roth) Miq. Tree Native
53 Mimosaceae Entada pursaetha DC. Liane Native
54 Verbenaceae Lantana camara L. Shrub Tropical America
55 Tiliaceae Grewia serrulata DC. Tree Native
56 Burseraceae Garuga pinnata Roxb. Tree Native
57 Verbenaceae Premna latifolia Rozb. var. latifolia Tree Native
58 Bignoniaceae Radermachera xylocarpa (Roxb.) K.Schum. Tree Native
59 Euphorbiaceae Phyllanthus emblica L. Tree Native
60 Dipterocarpaceae Shorea roxburghii G. Don. Tree Native
61 Moraceae Ficus hispida L.f. Tree Native
62 Caesalpiniaceae Cassia spectabilis DC. Tree Tropical America
63 Salvadoraceae Salvadora persica L. Tree Native
64 Euphorbiaceae Aporosa acuminata Thw. Tree Native
65 Rubiaceae Catunaregam spinosa (Thunb.) Tirvengadum Tree Native
66 Loganiaceae Strychnos potatorum L. Tree Native
67 Combretaceae Combretum albidum G. Don Liane Native
68 Fabaceae Dalbergia paniculata Roxb. Tree Native
69 Ebenaceae Diospyros montana Roxb. Tree Native
70 Rhamnaceae Ziziphus xylopyrus (Retz.) Willd. Tree Native
71 Sapindaceae Sapindus emarginatus Vahl Tree Native
72 Caesalpiniaceae Senna occidentalis (L.) Link Shrub Tropical America
73 Euphorbiaceae Breynia vitis-idaea (Burm.f.) Fischer Shrub Native
74 Meliaceae Walsura trifolia (A. Juss.) Harms Tree Native
75 Erythroxylaceae Erythroxylum monogynum Roxb. Tree Native
76 Sapindaceae Filicium decipiens (Wight & Arn.) Thw. Tree Native
77 Verbenaceae Tectona grandis L.f. Tree Native
78 Combretaceae Anogeissus latifolia (Roxb. Ex DC.) Wall Tree Native
79 Caesalpiniaceae Senna didymobotrya (Fresn.) Irwin & Barneby Shrub Non Native
80 Smilacaceae Smilax zeylanica L. Shrub Native
81 Rutaceae Chloroxylon swietenia DC. Tree Native
82 Boraginaceae Cordia obliqua Willd. Tree Native
83 Sterculiaceae Helicteres isora L.ShrubNative    
84 Hernandiaceae Gyrocarpus asiaticus Willd. Tree Native
85 Combretaceae Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb. Tree Native
86 Apocynaceae Carissa carandas L. Shrub Native
87 Celastraceae Maytenus heyneana (Roth) Raju & Babu Shrub Native
88 Simaroubaceae Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. Tree Native
89 Euphorbiaceae Phyllanthus reticulatus Poir. Shrub Native
90 Rubiaceae Psilanthus wightianus (Wight & Arn.) J. Leroy Shrub Native
91 Myrtaceae Syzygium tamilnadensis Rathakr. & Chithra Tree Native
92 Mimosaceae Albizia lebbeck (L.) Willd. Tree Native
93 Bixaceae Bixa orellana L. Tree Tropical America
94 Euphorbiaceae Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) Juss. Tree Native
95 Ulmaceae Trema orientalis (L.) Blume Tree Native
96 Moraceae Ficus benjamina L. Tree Malaysian
97 Myrsinaceae Ardisia solanacea Roxb. Tree Native
98 Bignoniaceae Dolichandrone atrovirens Sprague Tree Native
99 Moraceae Ficus benghalensis L. Tree Native
100 Euphorbiaceae Ricinus communis L. Shrub Tropical America
101 Moraceae Ficus tsjahela Burm.f. Tree Native
102 Fabaceae Derris scandens (Roxb.) Benth Liane Native
103 Meliaceae Swietenia mahagoni (L.) Jacq. Tree Native
104 Mimosaceae Albizia amara (Roxb.) Boivin Tree Native
105 Burseraceae Commiphora caudata (Wight & Arn.) Engler Tree Native
106 Caesalpiniaceae Delonix regia (Boj. ex Hook) Rafin. Tree South East Asia
107 Ebenaceae Diospyros ferrea (Willd.) Bakh. Shrub Native
108 Moraceae Ficus mollis Vahl Tree Native
109 Euphorbiaceae Givotia rottleriformis Griff. Tree Native
110 Tiliaceae Grewia hirsuta Vahl. Shrub Native
111 Olacaceae Olax scandens Roxb. Liane Native
112 Euphorbiaceae Bridelia crenulata Roxb. Tree Native
113 Poaceae Dendrocalamus strictus (Roxb.) Nees Shrub Native
114 Fabaceae Erythrina variegata L. Tree Native
115 Moringaceae Moringa concanensis Nimmo ex Gibs. Tree Native
116 Rubiaceae Wendlandia thyrsoidea (Schultes) Steud. Shrub Native
117 Rhamnaceae Ziziphus glabrata Heyne ex Roth Tree Native
118 Mimosaceae Acacia leucophloea (Roxb.) Willd. Tree Native
119 Alangiaceae Alangium salvifolium (L.f.) Wang. Tree Native
120 Mimosaceae Albizia saman (Jacq.) F.v. Muell. Tree Tropical America
121 Bignoniaceae Dolichandrone arcuata (Wight) Clarke Tree Native
122 Bignoniaceae Dolichandrone falcata (Wall.ex DC.) Seem. Tree Native
123 Moraceae Ficus racemosa L. Tree Native
124 Flacourtiaceae Flacourtia ramontchi L' Hér Tree Native
125 Lythraceae Lawsonia inermis L. Shrub Native
126 Rubiaceae Morinda pubescens J.E. Smith Tree Native
127 Pandanaceae Pandanus odoratissimus L.f. Shrub Native
128 Euphorbiaceae Phyllanthus indofischeri Bennet Tree Native
129 Anacardiaceae Spondias pinnata (L.f.) Kurz Tree Native
130 Apocynaceae Wrightia arborea (Dennst.) Mabberley Tree Native
131 Apocynaceae Wrightia tinctoria (Roxb.) Tree Native
logo

'Arulagam' was founded in 2002 as a non-profit organisation in honour and memory of Mr. Arulmozhi, who inspired many of his friends, including ourselves – the members of Arulagam – through his commitment to environmental conservation. We believe that regardless of its value to humanity, every form of life and its ecosystem is unique.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletters to receive latest news and updates.
I agree with the Privacy policy